Hi I don't understand all these emails I am getting about open office I just asked a question and I am getting tons of email about the open office but do not understand all these emails I hit unsubscribe & I continue to get them On Nov 4, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ++++++1 >> >> A little tuning, for what it is worth: >> >> It is not necessary to subscribe to any of these lists in order to ask for >> help. They will be moderated in. >> >> It might be nice if the mailto: entry specified a subject that would let >> us know it is from the request link though. That would emphasize that the >> requester is probably not subscribed and a direct CC: on any response is >> called for. >> > > yes, of course... > > >> >> Also, ooo-users might be a better target than ooo-dev. >> > > Why? These would be people reporting problems with the staging web site, > not the product ???? > > >> >> And, if within-site relative URLs are used for some cross-references, they >> will work when the cut-over happens as if they were always links to http://*. >> openoffice.org URLs. That way it is never necessary to expose >> ooo-site.apache.org addresses. (Cross references to the podling site are >> different, of course and they will hopefully all be redirected on >> graduation.) >> >> At some point, it should be fixed so http://ooo-site.apache.org redirects >> to http://openoffice.org (even though the pages are actually created at >> you-know-where, that can be made to work without looping [;<). It can also >> be arranged that http://ooo-site.apache.org/es/ is served up as >> http://es.openoffice.org, etc. >> > > yes, that is right... > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 15:22 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] easier access for N-L sites during staging process >> >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:14 PM, TJ Frazier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 11/3/2011 17:59, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm thinking of changing the links on: >>>>> >>>>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/**projects/native-lang.html< >> http://ooo-site.apache.org/projects/native-lang.html> >>>>> >>>>> to the format we're using at the staging site-- >>>>> >>>>> http://ooo-site.apache.org/"**nl-abbreviation" >>>>> >>>>> and putting a link on the staging home page >>>>> >>>>> http://ooo-site.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> to the revised http://ooo-site.apache.org/**projects/native-lang.html< >> http://ooo-site.apache.org/projects/native-lang.html> >>>>> at the bottom of the menu with something called "Native Language >>>>> Federation" >>>>> >>>>> to make it easier for folks to review the N-L sites. >>>>> >>>>> Due to the fact that we are now missing the navigating tabs on the >>>>> staging >>>>> site, we may want to deal with other areas like this as well for the >> time >>>>> being until a more in-depth discussion is had. This is merely for >>>>> checking >>>>> content accuracy for the time being. >>>>> >>>>> Are there any problems with this suggestion? >>>>> >>>> >>>> +1000 >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>>> I can probably get this done over the coming weekend sometime. >>>>> >>>>> Kay, >>> >>> You might consider a new column, which would have either a constant like >>> "Review" or "New site" (with new link), or be empty for "not moved yet". >> A >>> sentence about "What do I do if I find a problem?" should be aimed at >>> unsophisticated end-users. >>> >> >> Well the thing is the sites "are moved" in the sense that they're in the >> svn repository for the staging site. I'm not exactly sure what Dave is >> doing at the moment in terms of preparation to tell you the truth, but I'm >> fairly certain we've got everything that could be had "svn-ing" what was >> publicly known . >> >> However, the "What do I do if I find a problem?" link/page certainly has >> merit. About the only thing I could suggest though is an e-mail to this >> list (and they need to be subscibed first), and suggest an appropriate >> subject title to them so we could spot these things easily. Would something >> as simple as that work or what were you thinking? >> >> >> >>> -- >>> /tj/ >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> MzK >> >> "This is no social crisis >> Just another tricky day for you." >> -- "Tricky Day", the Who >> >> > > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "This is no social crisis > Just another tricky day for you." > -- "Tricky Day", the Who Suzie Shreve "The Plant Lady" 928-300-2759 [email protected]
