So, this exceptionalism for "friends for Rob" is being offered, without consideration at all for those friends of OpenOffice.org who have relied on those e-mail forwardings and proudly organized their e-mail existence around that affiliation. This smells a bit like mit.alumni.edu (or whatever the domain is) dropping all of those graduates who fail to sustain some sort of annual gift level.
Why can't the focus be on achieving the best possible result for all of those folks? - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 08:40 To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [ISSUE] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Uwe Altmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rob > > Am 05.11.11 16:18, schrieb Rob Weir: >> We don't even need Oracle for this. You can see which ID's are active >> in project work by doing reports in Bugzilla.... > > Could you please refrain from the idea that someone who does actually > not post bug reports is not active at all in the Project? I thought > Apache (the people there of course) had learned this lesson in the meantime. > -- That is just an example. We also know the addresses of who has edited the wiki, and is posting to the mailing lists, for example. But if you think you are active without interacting with the project at all, then I would beg to disagree. -Rob > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > Uwe Altmann >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
