Rob Weir ha scritto:
3) We can link to (but not host) 3rd party builds and distributions
based on our source code releases. These 3rd party builds could
include GPL/LPGL items. If you look at a typically Apache project,
like Subversion, you see a large number of links to externally hosted
binaries, for platform ports as well as enhanced versions:
http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html
So, in order to include LGPL/GPL linguistic tools, the binaries should
be hosted and, I presume, distributed externally from Apache infrastructure.
Does this fact affect in any way the use of the Apache OOo brand?
Is a fair use of the brand compiling and distributing a binary that
includes vanilla OOo code + linguistic tools while labeling it "Apache
OpenOffice.org"?
Regards,
Gianluca
--
Lettura gratuita o acquisto di libri e racconti di fantascienza,
fantasy, horror, noir, narrativa fantastica e tradizionale:
http://www.letturefantastiche.com/
