On 15 November 2011 21:03, Danese Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Ross Gardler > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 15 November 2011 18:31, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Why the AL is important for such a "standard" >> > such as Open Office and ODF; >> >> Hey, we can even quote Stallman there. >> >> I'm not sure I'm +1 on an open letter or not. I certainly like Rob's >> manifesto/top ten type idea. I'm not sure we need something that might >> be seen as aggressive, if the TDF as a whole really reacted the way we >> were told then such a letter may be seen as an attack on the TDF >> itself, rather than an attempt to address FUD from a few. >> >> Ross >> > > +1 to what Ross is saying (and I think Simon was trying to get at the same > issue). A list of things we're doing (from the project, *not* the > figurehead of ASF) would probably be less contentious.
I should have also said, if the FUD continues then an Open Letter from the foundation would certainly be appropriate. Ross
