Allen,

in the past the OpenOffice.org release process for micro releases looked like this:

* propose a tentative release data 3 months behind the release of the minor version * propose issues and must haves for the micro release, new features and new strings (which would cause a new translation cycle) were not allowed ** regressions newly introduced with the prior release get high priority for the micorelease (must haves)
** regular defects can be nominated for the micro release by everybody
* once all nominated and accepted issues got fixed a release candidate was provided and there was one week given for feedback. In case not all issues got fixed or new regressions got introduced a new release candidate cycle was done. * to ensure that this process comes to an end, there was a release committee with representatives from all areas (QA, Development, native-lang communities, marketing (PR), Linux distros, user experience) which decided on the final "go" for the release

for a 3.3.1 release I wouldn't change that process dramatically, so I have just a small list of issues and security fixes in mind, plus the changes we agree we have to do for branding. (I have one more favorite: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=112141 reintroduce color codes for mime type icons).

I'm not famliar enough with the ASF release process so I have no final proposal on how to do this for a 3.3.1 release, but I think we can use the old process as a basis. The new setup gives the opportunity to do some things better,

hth,
Martin

On 11/25/11 5:58 PM, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
Just a quick note that a proposal has been submitted using the form at
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/trademarks.html
to ooo-private...


Hello Stefan,



I would only be willing to consider your proposal if it addressed in detail
each of the questions/issues I raised in this email:



https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201111.mbox/%3C0
[email protected]%3E



So I think your request to ooo-private is either premature or incomplete,
since none of the questions/issues I raised above have been addressed and
accepted.



Thank you,



Allen





Reply via email to