On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:46 PM, TJ Frazier <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice work. Wiki details added. /tj/ >
Great, thanks much. If anyone is interested, I'm going to start a thread on infrastructure@ on the mail bounce side of this, to scope out that effort. If anyone has thoughts on the technical details feel free to follow the conversation there. -Rob > > On 11/30/2011 16:12, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> Note this is draft. But I'd like to see if I'm heading in the right >> direction. >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/%28Draft%29+Public+Statement+on+Email+Forwarding >> >> The idea would be to put this up on the blog, out to the mailing >> lists, prominently linked from home page of podling and OOo websites, >> and spread the word through social networks. >> >> But not yet. This is still draft. >> >> I've thrown in the shut off date as January 31st, 2012. This has not >> been discussed, so consider that to be just a placeholder for now. >> (Again, this is just draft). >> >> Some specific points that could use more detail include project >> services (lists, wikis, Bugzilla, etc.) that would be very commonly >> used with openoffice.org email addresses. I think I listed them all. >> >> But can you think of others? >> >> Also, if anyone knows what we should recommend for BZ and Wiki >> accounts, feel free to fill in those details, either on the list or >> directly on the wiki. >> >> The other parts to this, if you recall, are: >> >> 1) Working with Infra@ on a bounce notification. I have not started >> this beyond some vigorous arm waving. >> >> 2) A wiki page that the bounce notification would point to, showing >> the mapping of the various utility and mailing list addresses. I >> think we can recycle information already on the wiki page dealing with >> the list migration. >> >> 3) Ideally, translation of the above, once finalized, into major user >> languages. >> >> And obviously it will be easier to coordinate this if we can agree on >> a date for retiring the forwarding service. We're currently >> out-of-policy with this, though I think no one wants to just pull the >> plug without fair notice to users. >> >> -Rob >> >> > >
