On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 09.12.2011 10:52, Raphael Bircher wrote: >> >> Am 09.12.11 10:46, schrieb Andre Fischer: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We are making good progress with removing category X licensed code (see >>> [1]). >>> On [2], first table, you can see, that most issues have been resolved, >>> the >>> remaining ones are being worked on. >>> >>> Therefore I will turn my attention to handling the category B (see [3]) >>> code. >>> It is now part of the SVN repository and can be found as archives in the >>> top-level ext_sources/ directory. >>> >>> As far as I understand it, the category B code will not be part of a >>> source >>> release. It has to be checked out from SVN. The configure (.in) script >>> has to >>> be cleaned up so that category B code is not built by default but can be >>> activated with a single switch, similar to the current --enable-copyleft >>> switch. >>> >>> Does anybody have an idea for a name for the new switch better than >>> --enable-category-b ? >> >> --with-42 but this option should realy solve all problems ;-) > > > I like this one, but my proposal is: > --enable-weak-copyleft-components >
Would it be feasible to have more granular flags, one for each category-b component? Or is it all-or-nothing? > Best regards, Oliver.
