Hi; --- Gio 15/12/11, Rob Weir <[email protected]> ha scritto: ... > > This is a good start, and thanks, Pedro, for reaching out > to them. > But we'll need more than a private email to make this > suitable for inclusion in default source releases. >
I am aware of this. I just brought the matter here because we should be planning to update the bsh tarball and it's corresponding patch to the latest version so that we don't have unexpected surprises later on. While here: The patch for beanshell and others, carries a Makefile with an LGPL header: these should all be updated. In ucpp we are using already an AL2 header: perhaps I am naive but we should probably not use any license headers for files in patches and assume they are under the same license as the upstream code. cheers, Pedro.
