--- Sab 17/12/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile <[email protected]> ha scritto: ... > Data: Sabato 17 dicembre 2011, 00:27 > Hi Pedro, > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:10:55PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni > wrote: > > > I'm going to create a feature branch, named > gbuild (I won't > > > follow the apache-id naming schema, because this > was not > > > my work, nor am I going to be the only one > committing code > > > to it). > > > > And as I said I'll gladly move there and check the > FreeBSD > > required changes. > > > > > I'll apply the set of patches here > > > http://people.apache.org/~arielch/gbuild-13-12-2011/ > > > except > > > http://people.apache.org/~arielch/gbuild-13-12-2011/9999-gbuild-convert-lingucomponent.patch > > > that didn't get very well on Windows. > > > > > > > FWIW, > > > > I noticed there is this change on the gnumake4 > branch: > > > > vcl2gnumake: #i116588# move vcl to gbuild (step 1, > linux) > > http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/gnumake4/rev/373f4b04c6b8 > > > > but it's not on your list, maybe I missed it. > > this is rather old, and integrated into OOO340: > http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO340/rev/373f4b04c6b8 > > That cws was fully integrated: > http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO340/rev/18597186a506 > > > > Question: shall I copy the whole trunk on the > branch or > > > only trunk/main? > > > > > > > main is enough. > > I'm still uncertain about the layout. I do not want to use > my apache-id, > this is not my work (well, I converted some modules to > gbuild, but it's > the main work from Mathias Bauer, Michael Stahl, et. al. - > that info is > kept in the commit messages), and I'm not the only one to > commit code in > that branch (I don't do MacOS, FreeBDS, and my Win > knowledge is rather > poor, so this has to be a team work). > > May be I can use: > > branches/gbuild/gbuild1 >
Or branches/cws-integration/gnumake4 It doesnt really matter, we will remove it when the code is integrated. ;) Pedro.
