Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Dec 17, 2011 5:09 PM, "Simon Phipps" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2011 4:13 PM, "Ross Gardler" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It's not the relative adoption I want to show. If I did want that then > > Michaels would indeed be a better document). > > What do you want to show? Maybe one of us can help by coming up with a > suitable graphical representation that shows it without misrepresenting > other facts?
I'm looking for something that shows diversity in the open document format ecosystem. I don't want to get into marking territory, comparing size, arguing over who is better or more active or inactive or whatever. I want facts, nothing more. Just an alphabetised list of all projects that consume and/or produce ODF would be ideal. Anything along those lines would be very much appreciated. Ross
