On 17 December 2011 22:01, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Ross Gardler > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 17 December 2011 19:25, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Does that include converters and commercial offerings that have embedded >>> support for ODF consumption and production? (I suppose if Symphony is in >>> that diagram, the answer is yes at least for embedded support.) >>> >> >> Yes, although I realise a request for an itemisation of *everything* >> is probably unrealistic. What I want is something that gives an idea >> of the reach of ODF and therefore the potential sphere of influence >> that Apache OpenOffice code, under a permissive license, might have. >> > > The Wikipedia article is a good source of ODF-supporting applications > and tools. But we should avoid stereotyping OpenOffice as being only > an ODF editor. It has broad support for importing and exporting many > other formats, standard as well as well-established proprietary > formats.
Noted - thanks Rob. Ross
