Hi,
Le 19 déc. 11 à 11:20, FR web forum a écrit :
----- Mail original -----
De: "Rob Weir" <[email protected]>
However, inserting a point of view regarding what is and isn't a
'fork" is not something that will be well received by other Wikipedia
editors. They want factual information, a neutral point of view,
backed by authoritative citations.
You are right Rob
And french WP editors confirm: AOO is a fork.
And this is plain wrong.
I remember they did their best to drop the OOo4Kids page at the
begining, and we had to fight and ask for help to a lot of people to
avoid the page being removed.
Reason: old releases are not supported by ASF and english WP
article is a Marketing message.
I think Rob remark about Microsoft is very relevant. Anyway, it's
obvious french WP people scratched their head a long time before to
find the most little reason they could.
I would like to see an official position from the Apache people. Is
it possible ? (maybe a link I missed ?)
See: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Apache_OpenOffice.org
If you have some information to contradict them, you should publish
your official position on Apache blog.
Honestly, I have some doubt they will change anything.
Regards,
Eric Bachard
--
qɔᴉɹə
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news
