On Dec 30, 2011, at 2:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:43 AM, TJ Frazier <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 12/29/2011 18:26, kay.schenk wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 3:45 AM, TJ Frazier<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 12/28/2011 23:50, Dave Fisher wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Dec 28, 2011, at 7:19 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>>> >>>> There's some more CSS trouble with the API: >>>> >>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/api/****docs/common/ref/com/sun/**star/**<http://www.openoffice.org/api/**docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/**> >>>>>> module-ix.html<http://www.**openoffice.org/api/docs/** >>>>>> common/ref/com/sun/star/**module-ix.html<http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/module-ix.html> >>>>>>> >>>>>> All the red has disappeared, and it's needed. The horizontal title >>>>>> bands >>>>>> are now blue on blue, and very hard to read. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> If I am following it properly this is due to background images that have >>>>> the wrong color. >>>>> >>>>> See this css: /api/docs/common/ref/idl.css >>>>> >>>>> Look for subtitle. I would suggest we change to pure background colors. >>>>> What color of red do you want and for which elements. It is easy to >>>>> play by >>>>> editing the css. >>>>> >>>>> I'm only going by my poor old jelly-ware here. Had I been smarter, I >>>>> >>>> would have saved a few screenshots. If you can supply some magic numbers >>>> for the /etc/hosts file ("Twang your magic twanger, Froggy!"), I'll take >>>> a >>>> look at the old api.whatever and report more comprehensively. This may >>>> have >>>> to do with anchors: the obscure title in my reference is the target of a >>>> link at the top of the page. (The link works fine.) >>>> >>>> As for looking at the CSS myself, that's beyond my fu at present. The >>>> color scheme for API was unique, and IMHO could stand some improvement, >>>> but >>>> it's got to /work/. AFAIK, the red was FFFF 0000 0000. >>>> >>> > the css comes originally from the autodoc tool and when i remember it > correctly I made minor changes to adapt the colors not more. I hope we can > replace the autodoc tool with another generator that use the type library > directly instead of parsing the IDL files again. And another tool that can > parse the UNO C++ runtime better than autodoc. I would love to drop autodoc > completely. > > > >> >>>> /tj/ (who is very tired of fumbling with things he doesn't understand, >>>> and >>>> would like to get back to fumbling with things he does understand, but >>>> that >>>> involves a lot of API look-up ...) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Things look fine with the white only background on this now. But... from >>> the api "home" page at >>> >>> http://www.openoffice.org/api/ >>> >>> I don't even see where this particular item is linked in. All the API docs >>> seem to be on the wiki. >>> >>> Please examine the second horizontal blue bar. It says, "Nested >> Modules", in darker blue on lighter blue, if you can read it. The link to >> it is the first words on about the third line of the page; that, too, is >> not marked very clearly (as a link). IIRC, these were bolded when they were >> links, but YMMV. /tj/ >> > > i can't find it either way. The reason is that i have made heavy use of the > navigation bar on the left side of the old page and have inserted some more > items there. These are completely missed now. I will rework the content of > the page asap to bring back some missing links.
I have repaired the missing and improper css. I think that the api docs are now in good shape. Tell us about the kinds of special links you had on the Kenai lefthand navigation. Regards, Dave > > Juergen
