On 12/31/11 8:36 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 30, 2011, at 2:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:43 AM, TJ Frazier<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/29/2011 18:26, kay.schenk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 3:45 AM, TJ Frazier<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/28/2011 23:50, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 28, 2011, at 7:19 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
[snip]
There's some more CSS trouble with the API:
http://www.openoffice.org/api/****docs/common/ref/com/sun/**star/**<http://www.openoffice.org/api/**docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/**>
module-ix.html<http://www.**openoffice.org/api/docs/**
common/ref/com/sun/star/**module-ix.html<http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/module-ix.html>
All the red has disappeared, and it's needed. The horizontal title
bands
are now blue on blue, and very hard to read.
If I am following it properly this is due to background images that have
the wrong color.
See this css: /api/docs/common/ref/idl.css
Look for subtitle. I would suggest we change to pure background colors.
What color of red do you want and for which elements. It is easy to
play by
editing the css.
I'm only going by my poor old jelly-ware here. Had I been smarter, I
would have saved a few screenshots. If you can supply some magic numbers
for the /etc/hosts file ("Twang your magic twanger, Froggy!"), I'll take
a
look at the old api.whatever and report more comprehensively. This may
have
to do with anchors: the obscure title in my reference is the target of a
link at the top of the page. (The link works fine.)
As for looking at the CSS myself, that's beyond my fu at present. The
color scheme for API was unique, and IMHO could stand some improvement,
but
it's got to /work/. AFAIK, the red was FFFF 0000 0000.
the css comes originally from the autodoc tool and when i remember it
correctly I made minor changes to adapt the colors not more. I hope we can
replace the autodoc tool with another generator that use the type library
directly instead of parsing the IDL files again. And another tool that can
parse the UNO C++ runtime better than autodoc. I would love to drop autodoc
completely.
/tj/ (who is very tired of fumbling with things he doesn't understand,
and
would like to get back to fumbling with things he does understand, but
that
involves a lot of API look-up ...)
Things look fine with the white only background on this now. But... from
the api "home" page at
http://www.openoffice.org/api/
I don't even see where this particular item is linked in. All the API docs
seem to be on the wiki.
Please examine the second horizontal blue bar. It says, "Nested
Modules", in darker blue on lighter blue, if you can read it. The link to
it is the first words on about the third line of the page; that, too, is
not marked very clearly (as a link). IIRC, these were bolded when they were
links, but YMMV. /tj/
i can't find it either way. The reason is that i have made heavy use of the
navigation bar on the left side of the old page and have inserted some more
items there. These are completely missed now. I will rework the content of
the page asap to bring back some missing links.
I have repaired the missing and improper css.
I think that the api docs are now in good shape.
indeed it looks good now
Tell us about the kinds of special links you had on the Kenai lefthand
navigation.
seems to be not special, they are all there now ;-) thanks
Juergen
