On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 17:05 +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > I think we want have a good relation to them and we should potentially > > send a friendly reminder that we see a problem here. > > As a user I would expect that I get the latest OOo 3.3 version. And in > > the future we would like to use it to get an AOO with some explanation. > > Sure. However, Ubuntu and the vast majority of distributions always > shipped ooo-build calling it OpenOffice.org, and it is reasonable that > when ooo-build became LibreOffice (thus a fork instead of a patchset) > they decided to minimize the effect of the name change. > > But now it would make sense that the "openoffice"/"openoffice.org" > namespace is left free for Apache OpenOffice.
Although I understand how that happened, I'm sorry to say that I don't see how anyone can construe it to be anything more then a case of 'bait and switch'. //drew > > Regards, > Andrea. >
