That's why I said *minimum*. -----Original Message----- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 08:16 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [RELEASE]: help wanted to define default dictionaries for languages
On 1/17/12 5:12 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I'm going by what is being covered with developer snapshots at the moment: > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots> that is of course a wrong assumption, the list of languages there is only a first guess of languages where we have more or less identified volunteers who want to take look on it. It doesn't make sense to built all possible languages right now, especially when we don't have the pootle data integrated and know how complete it is. Juergen > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andre Fischer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 04:18 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [RELEASE]: help wanted to define default dictionaries for > languages > > Hi Dennis, > > On 17.01.2012 02:14, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> If you look at the localization languages that are on the current list for >> built-by-AOO packages as part of a release, that effectively identifies the >> *minimum* set of languages that writing tools are required for. > > Can you provide a link for this? > > Thanks, > Andre > >> [...] >
