Hi On 30 January 2012 14:07, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote: > > > On 2012-01-30 1:37 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> >> On 30 January 2012 13:35, Dave Fisher<dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 8:26 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I used to have admin permissions on the old site. I no longer seem to. >>>> I receive requests (as does Florian E.) to delete mail mistakenly >>>> posted to the public lists, but I cannot do much about it directly. >>>> >>>> I can route to those who *do* have admin permissions on the old site, >>>> if you like. There are other small things to do, too, that require >>>> admin on the Kenai site. >>> >>> >>> You should be able to get to the old site, but it will be going away. >> >> >> I can easily get to the old site. >> The point of my email was that I no longer have admin privileges. I >> need them to do the things asked of me. > > > What specific things are being asked of you?
To remove a specific email message posted to a public list (documentation) by mistake. > > Why aren't they being brought to the list (either details, or at least an > overview of what this work is about)? Because the person wanting the removal, I presume, did not know about the new changes. I have no problem explaining things--have--but I'm simply laying out the facts. > > What of this work will still need to be done once the old site goes away? No idea, as not sure what precisely will replace the old. Actually, and my apologias, but I have to fill in a lot of gaps in your question to arrive at any kind of sense. I think you mean, "Speaking of this matter, where you had admin privileges that allowed you to do things on behalf of mistaken users, will you, or someone like you, still be needing that order of privilege, once we decommission and remove the old site? Removal would mean that all queries related to admin tasks would have to come to this public list, which required subscription." The interesting thing, perhaps: Would the old archives holding the mistaken mail posts also migrate and if so would they still need ad hoc pruning per request? I'd goes two yeas won't make a nay. louis > > - Shane > > >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> If none of this is needed, good to hear. But the messages are there >>>> still. >>> >>> >>> As soon as we decide to cut it off we will. We thought we needed to keep >>> it around for template and extension site login, but that is already broken. >>> >>> I did find it necessary to go to the Kenai svn to finish the specs >>> migration, but that was done by altering my /etc/hosts/. >>> >>> Is it time to remove the old OOo? >> >> >> Yes. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> >> >> louis
