+1 - Dennis
(It reminded me that there were different rules for the "best viewed using XXXX, download it now" buttons and that had me smile. I am not suggesting any sort of parity here.) -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Rist [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 09:16 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Logo request for website listing money saving software links +1 On 2/17/2012 8:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > A request has come to the private list, asking permission to use the > logo for a website. > > The request is not very detailed, but it looks like the link would be > directing back to us for a download > > IMHO we would be well served by having two logos: > > 1) One that clearly identifies the AOO product and is used only for > our official websites, authorized releases, etc. It is like our > corporate seal (if we had one). It is a mark that indicates the > authenticity of a product of this project, whether a software release, > a website, a press release or whatever. We want there to be no > confusion that when this logo is used, it vouched for the source of > the item to which the logo is affixed. The source is the Apache > OpenOffice project. > > 2) One or more other logos, perhaps based on the first, but distinct. > Maybe a "Get Apache OpenOffice" logo, or similar. This would be a > "friend of the project" logo, a "I<heart> AOO" logo, or "Powered by > AOO"or similar that could be used more freely, with the only > requirement being that the logo must always link to our homepage (or > download page?) and to nothing else. > > The nice thing about this approach is we can issue a blanket > permission statement on the 2nd logo > > -Rob
