On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/27/12 13:30, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> This is based on a draft from Maho, with some additional edits from >> me. Please take a look and suggest improvements: >> >> >> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_openoffice_has_been_ported > > If Maho approves, I have some suggestions: > > To the end of the first paragraph add " Maintaining this new port > in Apache source tree helps improve the overall portability of > the system and provides another valuable testing environment." > > The second paragraph, may sound better "FreeBSD is a free operating system > based on Berkeley's 4.4 BSD source release." Add a last sentence in that > paragraph: "Since the origins of the Internet it has been known to break ftp > performance records and power important sites like Yahoo, Hotmail and the > ASF infrastructure." > > change (old) OpenOffice.org --> legacy OpenOffice.org > > Instead of MN and PG --> maho@ and pfg@ > > The FreeBSD team did not create fork. --> The FreeBSD team did not fork. > > Perhaps add "In FreeBSD, OpenOffice and LibreOffice porters share their > efforts > in a common mailing list: [email protected]. > > The "Notably, Jung-uk Kim ..." line should be moved to the end of the > "Historically," paragraph. > > "Technically, porting is not difficult." --> "Technically, porting has not > been very difficult.". > After " ... linux and FreeBSD are very similar", I would add "MacOSX and > FreeBSD also > share many similarities which have helped improve both ports." > > I would put that paragraph before the "Since the OpenOffice project > migrated". >
OK. I made those changes on the draft. One thing that is not clear to me is the reference to the "dynamic liner issue". Would it be worth linking to a bug report or something to explain what this was? -Rob > >> Maybe we could get photographs of Maho and Pedro as well? > > > Maybe just Maho's since he is the one signing ;). > > > cheers, > > Pedro.
