On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Andrew Rist <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On 3/12/2012 9:14 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> 2012/3/12 Jürgen >> Schmidt<jogischmidt@**googlemail.com<[email protected]> >> > >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to propose that we prepare the next set of dev snapshots >>> based on the revision r1299571 (same as last changed revision). It is not >>> the latest working buildbot revision but I would like to include an >>> increased buildid. >>> >>> Hi Juergen-- >> >> Could someone at some point enlighten us as to WHY the latest revisions >> aren't automatically scooped up by the buildbot? >> > The build bots pull the latest code every night. > > Or amybe a wiki page on >> this??? I also notice that the Linux-32 build via buildbot still has >> issues, and wonder, why, if changes have been successfully made to this >> build AND supposedly it's being built by Ubuntu (same as the developer >> builds), it still has issues. >> > The Linux-32 build bot is on Ubuntu 11.10 (as opposed to 10.04). There > are issues related to building on the newer Ubuntu. > We've been working through them, but there is one issue left with symbols > in CoinMP. I have not had time to work through that issue. > Andrew--Thanks for the clarification. I was confused by the wording in Juergen's message somehow...I thought what you are saying was the case. > > (I am wondering if CoinMP is deployed on the system - outside of the build > tree - when it is compiled. If so a version using a different set of g++ > and ld may be on the system, and blocking it from being rebuilt.) > > Anyway - it is down to the last four packages, and 'almost' builds ;-) > > > > I confess I know NOTHING about the buildbot, >> so if you can point me (and others) to some instructions that might be >> helpful. >> > http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/buildlogs/linux32/** > log/unxlngi6.pro.build.html<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux32/log/unxlngi6.pro.build.html> > that shows the latest set of logs > > http://ci.apache.org/builders/**openoffice-linux32-nightly<http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly> > shows the latest builds - click on a build and you can see the set of > steps it goes through. > Right, yes...I've looked at these. I need to learn more about the setup (inclusions etc) we have setup FOR the build as there appears to be several options. But I will explore on my own for the time being. Thanks again for this response. I would like to help with building but haven't had the time to it so far. > > A. > >> >> Thanks for everything! :) >> >> >> >> It is still no a official RC because of the existing show stopper issues. >>> I hope that we can start a second build later this week if possible. >>> >>> I would like to propose also that we continue to provide normal/complete >>> install sets for all languages. >>> >>> The dev snapshot from last week was proposed to the IPMC with zero >>> response so far. Not really promising and maybe somebody else has an idea >>> what we can do to get some early feedback. >>> >>> The builds will be made available again under >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/** >>> confluence/display/OOOUSERS/****AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+*** >>> *Snapshots<https://cwiki.**apache.org/confluence/display/** >>> OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+**Developer+Snapshots<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots> >>> > >>> >>> Juergen >>> >>> >> >> > -- > > Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect > OracleCorporate Architecture Group > Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847 > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Follow your bliss." -- attributed to Joseph Campbell
