Juergen, Refering to the emails from Lily and me days early, we think a regression testing against the RC build is necessary. I'm not sure how the community vote works, but I suggest to take Lily's vote as a MUST HAVE from QE perspective, after the build passed her regression test. Thanks!
- Simon 2012/4/5 xia zhao <lilyzh...@gmail.com> > Juergen, > > Usually how long the vote will continue? > > Lily > > 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com> > > > On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote: > > > >> How long shall we wait before we vote? > >> > >> > > We made some changes and we should at least give people the chance to > take > > a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will send a > call > > for the VOTE on various lists then. > > > > In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts. > > > > Juergen > > > > > > > > > >> 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt<jogischmidt@**googlemail.com< > jogischm...@googlemail.com> > >> >: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way to our > >>> first > >>> release. > >>> > >>> The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an ALv2 > >>> header. > >>> The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! > >>> > >>> The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. > >>> > >>> > >>> I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. > >>> > >>> Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR nl hu ru > >>> zh-TW fi > >>> > >>> The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were already > >>> built for the developer snapshots. > >>> > >>> We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are satisfied > >>> with > >>> the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as our first > >>> RC. > >>> > >>> > >>> Juergen > >>> > >> > > >
