Rob, I agree, that's why I ask how long the vote will continue. Once RC build is ready, the RC build test will begin, most focus on installation, and some regression testing.
Lily 2012/4/5 Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shenfeng Liu <liush...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Rob, > > Per the wiki where Lily proposed the RC build test plan, it will take <= > > 1 week. > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+RC+Build+Test+Plan > > > > > > OK. I would recommend that we do not delay the vote for the regression > test results. Instead, we should have the voting period be long enough > that the regression tests will be done before the vote closes. That way > IPMC members can do their release verification in parallel with Lily's > final testing. > > -Rob > > > > > - Simon > > > > 2012/4/5 Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Shenfeng Liu <liush...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Juergen, > > > > Refering to the emails from Lily and me days early, we think a > > > regression > > > > testing against the RC build is necessary. I'm not sure how the > > community > > > > vote works, but I suggest to take Lily's vote as a MUST HAVE from QE > > > > perspective, after the build passed her regression test. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > How long will it take to do a regression test against the RC build? > How > > > many days? > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Simon > > > > > > > > 2012/4/5 xia zhao <lilyzh...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > Juergen, > > > > > > > > > > Usually how long the vote will continue? > > > > > > > > > > Lily > > > > > > > > > > 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/5/12 10:10 AM, Yong Lin Ma wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> How long shall we wait before we vote? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > We made some changes and we should at least give people the > chance > > to > > > > > take > > > > > > a look on it. I would like start the vote on Monday and I will > > send a > > > > > call > > > > > > for the VOTE on various lists then. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime I should have enough time to sign the artifacts. > > > > > > > > > > > > Juergen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2012/4/5 Jürgen Schmidt<jogischmidt@**googlemail.com< > > > > > jogischm...@googlemail.com> > > > > > >> >: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hi, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> a lot of clean up work and also bugfixes were made on the way > to > > > our > > > > > >>> first > > > > > >>> release. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> The RAT output includes now only 2 files where one includes an > > ALv2 > > > > > >>> header. > > > > > >>> The other file is a left over and will be changed. A mistake! > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> The NOTICE, LICENSE are updated which was a lot of work. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> I would like to propose a new build based on revision r1309668. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Included languagues: en-US ar de cs fr es gl it ja zh-CN pt-BR > nl > > > hu > > > > ru > > > > > >>> zh-TW fi > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> The languages that we had on Pootle and where most of them were > > > > already > > > > > >>> built for the developer snapshots. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> We should take a closer look on these builds and when we are > > > > satisfied > > > > > >>> with > > > > > >>> the quality I would like to vote on this build to be used as > our > > > > first > > > > > >>> RC. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Juergen > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
