Hi Nancy, The source file is in .psd. Would Apache want those as well?
On Thursday, April 5, 2012, Nancy K wrote: > Wonderful! If Michael has the .psd or .ai vector original file, and we can > all access it later, that will help us resize it without the fuzziness - > and make further changes. > > I found the .psd and .ai feather file under apache.org/images > http://www.apache.org/images/ if that will be helpful later in any > redesign. Is there a /image > > It would be nice to add a dimension to the .jpg/.gif/.non-vector image > file name instead of 'small' 'wide' - I would suggest a width - something > like nameOfImage100px.jpg. > > I am new - but noticed openoffice.org/images file and a cujrent folder > for logos - good organization! > Nancy > > Nancy Web Design > Free 24 hour pass to lynda.com. > Video courses on SEO, CMS, > Design and Software Courses > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Michael Acevedo <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > To: "[email protected] <javascript:;>" < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> > Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 10:26 AM > Subject: Re: [WWW] new logo in staging only...I think we need a graphic > modification > > Hello all members, > > It's Michael Acevedo, I am away from the computer that holds the files > right now but I do have the original files if you need them. Where should I > send them? > > Otherwise, I am deeply honored by having Apache selecting the my logo for > OpenOffice. > > Please let me know. > > On Thursday, April 5, 2012, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Guillaume Fernandez (Club) < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that kevin's changes are very important. > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The looks is indeed more profesionnal. The capitalization has > > enhanced > > > > the > > > > natural readability of the logo. > > > > The kerning is better while somewhat a little dense (intermediate > > > position > > > > would > > > > be great). > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) The look of the main webpage is crucial : we absolutly have to > get a > > > > professional look and in my opinion this is not the case today. > > because > > > > of the > > > > JPEG quality and resolution (blurred image). We should improve the > > > quality > > > > of > > > > the JPEG (or use a non-destructive PNG). > > > > > > > > > > > +1. When I voted in favor of that logo I assumed that was just an > > example > > > rendering and that we had the SVG source for it, so we could scale it > to > > > other sizes. If we do not have these sources, then I don't think the > > logo > > > will work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guillaume > > > > (I am a new suscriber here at ooo-dev). > > > > > > > > Hi Kevin, > > > > On 04.04.2012 05:55, Kevin Grignon wrote: > > > > Kay et al. > > > > I can help here. I have the skills and the tools. > > > > Beyond getting the right size, I'd like to propose a few other small > > > tweak > > > > to > > > > the rendered logo. My proposed enhancements don't change the voted > and > > > > approved > > > > concept, rather, they merely some polish to the concept as we move > > > towards > > > > production consumption. > > > > See proposed enhancements: 4. Enhancements to Selected Logo Concept > > > (Kevin > > > > Grignon - started 2012-04-04) > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals > > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals > > > > > > > > > > I like the change of "Apache" to gray but am not so sure about its > > > > capitalization. I understand the reason (after you pointed it out to > us > > > > non-artists :) though. > > > > The kerning looks more homogeneous but somewhat dense. For example > the > > i > > > > and c > > > > in Office seem to almost touch. > > > > Regards, Andre > > > > I'll need to access the source files. > > > > Regards, Kevin > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kay Schenk<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Dave Fisher<[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > On 04/03/2012 03:46 PM, drew jensen wrote: > > > > Maybe one of should drop Michael Acevedo a note, see if he already > has > > a > > > > source > > > > file handy - xcf, svg. > > > > If not - I don't know of a svg (or any vector based) file for the bug > > > part > > > > of > > > > the image - I know how to recreate one properly from the 256px png > > image > > > > and > > > > wou -- Best, Michael
