On Apr 5, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Michael Acevedo wrote: > Hi Nancy, > > The source file is in .psd. Would Apache want those as well?
Yes, please! And thank you! Regards, Dave > > On Thursday, April 5, 2012, Nancy K wrote: > >> Wonderful! If Michael has the .psd or .ai vector original file, and we can >> all access it later, that will help us resize it without the fuzziness - >> and make further changes. >> >> I found the .psd and .ai feather file under apache.org/images >> http://www.apache.org/images/ if that will be helpful later in any >> redesign. Is there a /image >> >> It would be nice to add a dimension to the .jpg/.gif/.non-vector image >> file name instead of 'small' 'wide' - I would suggest a width - something >> like nameOfImage100px.jpg. >> >> I am new - but noticed openoffice.org/images file and a cujrent folder >> for logos - good organization! >> Nancy >> >> Nancy Web Design >> Free 24 hour pass to lynda.com. >> Video courses on SEO, CMS, >> Design and Software Courses >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Michael Acevedo <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> To: "[email protected] <javascript:;>" < >> [email protected] <javascript:;>> >> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 10:26 AM >> Subject: Re: [WWW] new logo in staging only...I think we need a graphic >> modification >> >> Hello all members, >> >> It's Michael Acevedo, I am away from the computer that holds the files >> right now but I do have the original files if you need them. Where should I >> send them? >> >> Otherwise, I am deeply honored by having Apache selecting the my logo for >> OpenOffice. >> >> Please let me know. >> >> On Thursday, April 5, 2012, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Guillaume Fernandez (Club) < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think that kevin's changes are very important. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1) The looks is indeed more profesionnal. The capitalization has >>> enhanced >>>>> the >>>>> natural readability of the logo. >>>>> The kerning is better while somewhat a little dense (intermediate >>>> position >>>>> would >>>>> be great). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2) The look of the main webpage is crucial : we absolutly have to >> get a >>>>> professional look and in my opinion this is not the case today. >>> because >>>>> of the >>>>> JPEG quality and resolution (blurred image). We should improve the >>>> quality >>>>> of >>>>> the JPEG (or use a non-destructive PNG). >>>>> >>>>> >>>> +1. When I voted in favor of that logo I assumed that was just an >>> example >>>> rendering and that we had the SVG source for it, so we could scale it >> to >>>> other sizes. If we do not have these sources, then I don't think the >>> logo >>>> will work. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Guillaume >>>>> (I am a new suscriber here at ooo-dev). >>>>> >>>>> Hi Kevin, >>>>> On 04.04.2012 05:55, Kevin Grignon wrote: >>>>> Kay et al. >>>>> I can help here. I have the skills and the tools. >>>>> Beyond getting the right size, I'd like to propose a few other small >>>> tweak >>>>> to >>>>> the rendered logo. My proposed enhancements don't change the voted >> and >>>>> approved >>>>> concept, rather, they merely some polish to the concept as we move >>>> towards >>>>> production consumption. >>>>> See proposed enhancements: 4. Enhancements to Selected Logo Concept >>>> (Kevin >>>>> Grignon - started 2012-04-04) >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Logo+Proposals >>> >>>>> >>>>> I like the change of "Apache" to gray but am not so sure about its >>>>> capitalization. I understand the reason (after you pointed it out to >> us >>>>> non-artists :) though. >>>>> The kerning looks more homogeneous but somewhat dense. For example >> the >>> i >>>>> and c >>>>> in Office seem to almost touch. >>>>> Regards, Andre >>>>> I'll need to access the source files. >>>>> Regards, Kevin >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Kay Schenk<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Dave Fisher<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>> On 04/03/2012 03:46 PM, drew jensen wrote: >>>>> Maybe one of should drop Michael Acevedo a note, see if he already >> has >>> a >>>>> source >>>>> file handy - xcf, svg. >>>>> If not - I don't know of a svg (or any vector based) file for the bug >>>> part >>>>> of >>>>> the image - I know how to recreate one properly from the 256px png >>> image >>>>> and >>>>> wou > > > > -- > Best, > Michael
