Hi Lily, On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:20:50AM +0800, xia zhao wrote: > Ariel, > > Do you means user have to remove the old packages manually?
I don't mean anything, I'm just describing the situation: that's the way I has been working since OOo 3.0.0 > It isn't reasonable for end users. Yes. Quite strange nobody seemed to complained about it (I haven't found previous bug reports about it). > Though keeping the old package is default behavior, I couldn't understand > the reason. Me neither. May be this was the design behind the 3 layer OOo, I've no idea. > If just want to keeping the previous configuration etc, is it > possible to split and erase other packages? > > No matter which reason, back to the upgrade problem, we need find one way > to resolve the couldn't launch or crash problem. Looking at the backtrace, the might have been introduced by changes on the extension handling, but I'm just guessing (I don't have a build with debugging symbols right now). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgpBAy52P5zve.pgp
Description: PGP signature
