Attention: UX wiki stakeholders, I have reviewed the links on the UX home page and captured my assessments and recommendations. If no objections, I will begin UX wiki refresh and archive activity on Monday.
Regards, Kevin On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Grignon <[email protected]>wrote: > Anyone will using IRQ for UX chats or meetings? > > Is this IRQ account still valid? > > irc://freenode/ux.openoffice.org > > Thoughts? > > Regards, > Kevin > > > > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Kevin Grignon > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Indeed, a single, unified vision of future design direction is important >> for all stakeholders and will help keep our broader effort focused. User >> experience design is about understanding how people use our products and >> how these product compliment and integrate into their real lives. UX looks >> forward to telling this story, both internally and externally. >> >> Regards, >> Kevin >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Yue Helen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1. With a refreshed UX wiki as a start, I expect UX to interact with dev >>> more closely. >>> >>> Helen >>> >>> 2012/5/7 Kevin Grignon <[email protected]> >>> >>> > Yes, making the community approachable is an important aspect of the >>> > refresh. >>> > >>> > Once we have refreshed the content, we need to make sure that the UX >>> > community wiki makes it really clear how people can get involved, make >>> it >>> > easy to contribute and have an impact on the design direction of the >>> > offering moving forward. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Kevin >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Zhe Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > +1 >>> > > A lot of content on wiki/website is out of date. It makes people >>> > > confused and not easy to get involved. >>> > > >>> > > 2012/5/7 Kevin Grignon <[email protected]>: >>> > > > Hello All, >>> > > > >>> > > > It appears that some content on the AOO user experience project >>> wiki ( >>> > > > http://www.openoffice.org/ux/) is somewhat dated and has lost >>> > relevance. >>> > > > >>> > > > In reviewing the wiki, some of the UX backlog content is still >>> relevant >>> > > and >>> > > > should be retained. However, other content, including: activities, >>> to >>> > do >>> > > > lists, and UX community membership are in need of a refresh. >>> > > > >>> > > > I propose that we clean up the UX wiki, archive non-relevant >>> content, >>> > > > harvest actionable and relevant backlog items, and start fresh. The >>> > goal >>> > > is >>> > > > the quickly refresh the wiki, re-establish our UX community, and >>> move >>> > > > forward together on the future design direction for AOO. >>> > > > >>> > > > Please share any thoughts or concerns, I will begin the refresh on >>> > > Monday, >>> > > > May, 14th, 2012. >>> > > > >>> > > > Best regards, >>> > > > Kevin >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Best Regards >>> > > From [email protected] >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> >
