Hello all, Thanks for input.
Here is what I understand the community is saying: AOO community = team [UX] = mailing list topic prefix User experience - design and development topic related to the end user experience People who contribute to user experience activities - a self-selected group of individuals working on a common user experience- related tasks for a period of time Pronoun "I" is preferred to "we" Got it. This makes sense. I'm still adapting to the "Apache" way. I appreciated the ongoing feedback and guidance. Regards, Kevin A contributor to the self-selected group of individuals working on a number of common user experience-related tasks for the next little while :) On Thursday, May 24, 2012, Yong Lin Ma wrote: > Whatever it is named, I think it is good for people who are > experienced in UX design identify themselves out here. Designers need > other's help to implement their ideas. The bar for UX design of such a > product is very low. Everyone can have its own opinions or brilliant > ideas. But it is also easy to mess up a product by combining many good > ideas together. If things going well, there will be situations that > people get different opinions about a ux change and the fall into > endless discussion. I would trust UX designer's choice in case like > that, if we a decision must be made in the end. > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Paulo de Souza Lima > <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2012/5/24 Rob Weir <[email protected]> > > > >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Kevin Grignon > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Juergen Schmidt < > >> [email protected] > >> >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2012 um 00:18 schrieb Paulo de Souza Lima: > >> >> > 2012/5/18 Juergen Schmidt <[email protected]> > >> >> > > >> >> > > Am Freitag, 18. Mai 2012 um 15:22 schrieb Paulo de Souza Lima: > >> >> > > > 2012/5/18 Jürgen Schmidt <[email protected]> > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > On 5/18/12 10:32 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Erik, > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Good stuff. Will do. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > do we really need such a separate page for UX community > >> members? I > >> >> > > don't > >> >> > > > > think so and I personally think it goes in the wrong > direction. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > There's nothing to loose, in my view. But I wouldn't call UX a > >> >> > > "community". > >> >> > > > I would call it a "team". > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > I am personally interested in many different areas of the > >> project > >> >> and > >> >> > > > > don't want to put my name on X different pages. My > contribution > >> in > >> >> the > >> >> > > > > different areas will be also different and will change from > >> time to > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > time. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > If you are interested in many areas (just like me) you are > free to > >> >> decide > >> >> > > > if you will place your name in all of them, or none. I don't > see a > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > problem > >> >> > > > with that. But if I am deeply involved with some project, I > would > >> >> like to > >> >> > > > place my name on it, for sure. Also, it's important from the > >> user's > >> >> point > >> >> > > > of view, to know who are the contacts for the issues they have. > >> And > >> >> a new > >> >> > > > contributor who wishes to have a larger involvement with the UX > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > activities > >> >> > > > (and others too) should be able to identify who else is > involved. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Such a page doesn't really reflect who is doing the work and > is > >> >> > > > > potentially misleading. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Again, I don't think so. Indeed, it doesn't reflect who is > doing > >> the > >> >> job, > >> >> > > > but it gives a clue. It would be worst
