Thanks Andrew, I am coming to that conclusion. I'm not sure why some of the styles are there though.
Are there some default styles in a vanilla new text document. The one I have may have been based on some other and inherited its styles etc? I see in the spec there are automatic styles too... which are inherant in a given object. I will do some head scratching and more reading/digging. Thanks again. On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak <and...@pitonyak.org> wrote: > > I did not bother to check the spec, but I will hazard a guess that the > problem is that the information is in the style itself. If the information > is in the style, then if it is not persisted then it will be lost. > > Are you looking at a style that has a parent style? I expect that if I > create a child style and do NOT set a specific attribute, that it inherits > the value from the parent and will not, therefore, be persisted into the > file. The parent will have the values persisted, of course.... > > > > On 05/27/2012 06:06 AM, Ian wrote: >> >> Ah I think I see why the font declarations are there now. >> They are required to meet some of the style definitions. >> >> But I'm not sure why all those styles attriburtes are there? >> >> <style:text-properties style:use-window-font-color="true" >> style:font-name="Liberation Serif" fo:font-size="12pt" >> fo:language="en" fo:country="US" style:letter-kerning="true" >> style:font-name-asian="文泉驛正黑" style:font-size-asian="12pt" >> style:language-asian="zh" style:country-asian="CN" >> style:font-name-complex="Lohit Devanagari" >> style:font-size-complex="12pt" style:language-complex="hi" >> style:country-complex="IN" fo:hyphenate="false" >> fo:hyphenation-remain-char-count="2" >> fo:hyphenation-push-char-count="2"/> >> >> Are they required? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ian >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Ian<i...@amham.net> >> Date: Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:35 PM >> Subject: [Dev] Redundant information in ODF document >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I am interested in looking into the ODF documents produced by AOO with >> a respect to the document schema etc. >> >> One thing I noticed when creating a simple almost "Hello World" >> document is that there are some unused and probably not required font >> infomation in the content.xml. >> >> <office:font-face-decls> >> <style:font-face style:name="Lohit Devanagari1" >> svg:font-family="'Lohit Devanagari'"/> >> <style:font-face style:name="URW Bookman L" svg:font-family="'URW >> Bookman L'" style:font-adornments="Light" >> style:font-pitch="variable"/> >> <style:font-face style:name="Liberation Serif" >> svg:font-family="'Liberation Serif'" style:font-family-generic="roman" >> style:font-pitch="variable"/> >> <style:font-face style:name="Liberation Sans" >> svg:font-family="'Liberation Sans'" style:font-family-generic="swiss" >> style:font-pitch="variable"/> >> <style:font-face style:name="Lohit Devanagari" >> svg:font-family="'Lohit Devanagari'" >> style:font-family-generic="system" style:font-pitch="variable"/> >> <style:font-face style:name="文泉驛正黑" svg:font-family="文泉驛正黑" >> style:font-family-generic="system" style:font-pitch="variable"/> >> </office:font-face-decls> >> >> Is this by design? Why? Or some sort of bug? >> >> Only the URW Bookman font is used by the few lines of text in the >> document. >> >> And looking into the Styles xml document I see tons of possibly >> redundant entries. There for possible future edits of the document? Eg >> Footer styles. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ian >> > > -- > Andrew Pitonyak > My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt > Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php >
