+1 from me.

On vacation a few more days...

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:25 PM, "Dennis E. Hamilton" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> +1 
> 
> sounds like a plan
> 
> - Dennis
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 07:59
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Moving Category-B tarballs (was Re: [PROPOSAL] Starting the 
> graduation process)
> 
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> --- Lun 18/6/12, Rob Weir <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Andre did a nice job but the category B tarballs are
>>>> still in SVN so I dont consider the issue has been
>>>> solved.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Do you have any proposal for how that could addressed
>>> without breaking the released AOO 3.4.0 source
>>> distribution?
>>> 
>> 
>> Hasn't changed.
>> 
>> Axe and add a note to the src distribution to let
>> people know where to find the (already optional)
>> tarballs.
>> 
> 
> This would also be cleared up after 3.4.1 is released, since that
> would not depend on the legacy location for the tarballs.  It is
> easier to break 3.4.0 once a 3.4.1 is out.
> 
> It is fine with me if we delay graduation until after 3.4.1 is
> released.  This also avoids having graduation trigger a disruptive set
> of naming changes to the release and the website at the same time
> we're trying to get out a release.
> 
>> Pedro.
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to