On Aug 24, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Rob Weir wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> wrote:
>> 
>> In due course, when we've all had a little rest after the release of AOO 
>> 3.4.1, it will be necessary to do some triage work on the Brainstorming, so 
>> that the most requested changes make their way onto the planning table for 
>> AOO 4.0.  Many of the suggestions can be amalgamated, for example improved 
>> doc/docx, xls/xlsx etc support; within reason these can all be amalgamated 
>> into "improved support for MS Office formats, current and legacy".  Other 
>> suggestions are readily achievable by existing faciites in OpenOffice; such 
>> requests might indicate need for better education of Users or more 
>> accessible documentation/tutorials.
>> 
>> Supposing that the Brainstorm is continued beyond AOO 4.0, should we prune 
>> it in the light of whatever choices are made for AOO 4.0; should we also 
>> register comments against some of the already readily achievable functions, 
>> to give pointers to (say) the Forums and/or tutorials which indicate how to 
>> do that function?
>> 
>> Could we have some discussion on how best to analyse and progress the 
>> current nearly 300 suggestions [as of date of posting)
>> 
> 
> We're getting a lot more feedback than I expected:  305 people have
> submitted 284 ideas and cast 3,106 votes.
> 
> IMHO, this is wonderful.   In some sense the voting process itself
> helps triage, especially if project members are also submitting ideas
> and voting, which I hope we all are.

Not all of us have the time.
> 
> I like your idea of combining closely related or duplicate ideas.
> Maybe in the end we could promote a "top 10" list of ideas, in a blog
> post, and collect also commentary from project members related to
> these top 10 ideas.

I think that coming back to ooo-dev with "Top" ideas is appropriate.

> 
> Another approach would be to take the top ideas and use them as
> additional input to a survey design that Kevin and Graham were looking
> into.  We could take the top 10 (or 20) ideas and in the survey ask
> users to rate them.

FYI - The ASF Board has created a new TLP called Apache Steve which will expose 
the Voting mechanism used by the ASF membership.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> That help us get around the natural bias of Google Moderator, which is
> that ideas submitted first will get more votes because they've had
> more time to be voted on.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Rob
> 
>> --
>> Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie>

Reply via email to