On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
> I see two things happening on this thread:  Creation of a laundry list for 
> what a PMC member should be.  A request for PPMC members to be introspective.
>
> I suggest that there is a single issue that, if it were addressed instead, 
> would unlock appreciation of what needs to be introduced in order for the 
> podling to graduate.
>
> The feedback offered to us is that this podling has failed to demonstrate 
> self-governance (in the Apache Way of things), particularly with regard to 
> healthy community building.  That's the feedback.
>
> It's not about technical skills, the quality of the code base, participation 
> in various activities, none of those things.
>
> Here are two questions that should be for someone to answer about us:
>
>  1. What would be the visible evidence that the podling, with its PMC, is 
> self-governing and healthy, with strong fostering of a sustainable community?
>
>  2. In what ways do PMC members demonstrate their commitment to creation and 
> sustaining of such a healthy self-governing project?
>
> Here's one suggestion: Participants and contributors experience being welcome 
> and valued.

Well said.  I agree, those are two primary points that need to be
addressed.  Let's have some specificity here, so we can get to work
making some progress.


Phil

Reply via email to