On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Rob; > > The binary was something I built on my spare time with MSVC 9.0 never used. > I got a report that the windows executable doesn't work and that it doesn't > build with MSVC 2010. >
Which issue is it? I don't see one that matches this description here: http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/dmake/issues/list > I deprecated the windows binary package: apparently there is demand as there > were around 1000 > downloads. > > > Dmake is in need of real love. More documentation is welcome but the main > problem is that I just don't care about it. > According to the change log. nothing has changed in Dmake since February: http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/dmake/source/list What are we using for Windows release builds of 3.4.0 and 3.4.1? Surely there was something that worked? And if the code hasn't changed since February, then why is there a problem now. I'm obviously missing something. -Rob > cheers, > > Pedro. > > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Rob Weir <rabas...@gmail.com> >>To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> >>Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 7:48 PM >>Subject: Re: Dmake binaries ? >> >>On Oct 20, 2012, at 8:38 PM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi; >>> >>> Apparently the Dmake binaries that I made available on the Dmake site don't >>> work. >>> >>> I think it would save some time, especially for Windows users to have a >>> binary >>> installable package. Perhaps some would like to provide one? >>> >> >>Could you be more specific? Is it an install issue? Is it something >>we can fix with better documentation? >> >> >>> best regards, >>> >>> Pedro. >> >> >>
