--- Sab 20/10/12, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> > Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Hi Rob; > > > > The binary was something I built on my spare time with > MSVC 9.0 never used. > > I got a report that the windows executable doesn't work > and that it doesn't build with MSVC 2010. > > > > Which issue is it? I don't see one that matches this > description here: > > http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/dmake/issues/list > It was reported by direct email. I "solved" it by removing the previous windows binary. > > I deprecated the windows binary package: apparently > there is demand as there were around 1000 > > downloads. > > > > > > Dmake is in need of real love. More documentation is > welcome but the main problem is that I just don't care about > it. > > > > According to the change log. nothing has changed in Dmake > since > February: http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/dmake/source/list > > What are we using for Windows release builds of 3.4.0 and > 3.4.1? > Surely there was something that worked? And if the > code hasn't > changed since February, then why is there a problem now. > I use 4.12.2 regularly. AOO uses 4.12. > I'm obviously missing something. > This is not a problem for OpenOffice since we build from source but people would like to have a binary version. I wont be providing any unless someone contributes it. Pedro.
