On 4 Jan 2012, at 22:59, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: >> I personally find the absence of a list-name prefix, something simple like >> [ooo-users], to be a problem. >> >> First, if folks BCC the list, it is a problem. And when getting >> cross-postings among lists that don't prefix, that is another problem. >> >> And there are some peculiar situations where a message is administratively >> forwarded from one list to another where, as the recipient of one of those, >> I have no idea what happened and why it is in my inbox (or spam folder) >> instead of where my mail-arrival rules put things. >> >> On the other hand, there is no button to push to make prefixing work. Sorry. >> >> As Andrea observes, it is possible to request that infrastructure make >> whatever incantations are necessary to add a prefix for this list. >> >> I have not heard any objection. >> >> Applying the Apache lazy-consensus principles, I will wait at least 72 hours >> (until midnight UTC: 2012-01-07T24:00Z) for any objections to be heard. If >> the discussion has quieted and there is no substantive objection, I'll turn >> in a request to add the prefix. >> > > Actually, you need to make that proposal on ooo-dev
Since they are not affected, why would that be useful or necessary, Rob? S. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
