Fernado,
Thanks!
I started to respond here and decided that would be a distraction to the
community.
I started to respond on one of the blogs but decided that would be a
distraction from my working on the standard.
I think intelligent users will consider the source and make the
appropriate evaluation.
Hope you are having a great week!
Patrick
PS: One factoid for anyone who does have the time/interest in
responding: Where are the LibreOffice members in the ODF TC at OASIS?
The non-contribution of LibreOffice to the standard is another example
of their free rider status in the open source community. The taking of
the OpenOffice source code is another.
On 5/29/2012 9:08 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
After "Can Apache OpenOffice still compete with LibreOffice?"
http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=0049362B-A9A4-500D-DDCDBD374AC219B5
comes another gem:
Is Apache OpenOffice losing the race?
http://www.computerworld.in/news/apache-openoffice-losing-race-5742012
but wait, there's more:
OpenOffice: a house of sand
http://www.unixmen.com/openoffice-a-house-of-sand/
I suggest the next sensationalist headline: "OpenOffice, that piece of ****
nobody should use"
;-)
FC
--
Patrick Durusau
[email protected]
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
Twitter: patrickDurusau
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
