On 05/29/2012 09:32 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Fernado,
Thanks!
I started to respond here and decided that would be a distraction to
the community.
I started to respond on one of the blogs but decided that would be a
distraction from my working on the standard.
I think intelligent users will consider the source and make the
appropriate evaluation.
Hope you are having a great week!
Patrick
PS: One factoid for anyone who does have the time/interest in
responding: Where are the LibreOffice members in the ODF TC at OASIS?
The non-contribution of LibreOffice to the standard is another example
of their free rider status in the open source community. The taking of
the OpenOffice source code is another.
On 5/29/2012 9:08 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
After "Can Apache OpenOffice still compete with LibreOffice?"
http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=0049362B-A9A4-500D-DDCDBD374AC219B5
/snip/
And so on. If the LO and OO people would stop feuding with each other
and devote just a little time to
fixing the few remaining bugs in Lotus Symphony, they would have a
professional office suite, not
something cobbled together like the tweedle-dum/tweedle-dee OO and LO.
You OO and LO guys
just can't stand to see a name like IBM on anything, can you? It _is_
open source.
--doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
