On 30 May 2012 at 7:49, Fernando Cassia wrote: Send reply to: [email protected] Date sent: Wed, 30 May 2012 07:49:26 -0300 Subject: Re: Total User confusion From: Fernando Cassia <[email protected]> To: [email protected]
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Niall Martin
<[email protected]>wrote:

  I have experimented with Open Office Base, but  found it difficult
  to
find my way
into its facilities and vocabulary, to work out what it can do for
me.

Here is a tutorial, FWIW.

http://inpics.net/base.html

By the way, I remember Lotus Approach vaguely (under OS/2)... I think
its database design screens were simpler.

FC

Niall Martin wrote:
Looks interesting. I shall investigate. Thanks


Niall Martin
Phone 0131 4678468
Please reply to: niall<at>rndmartin.cix.co.uk

I have been experimenting Base before if first appeared in OOo 2.0 (I even experimented with Base using developer snapshots while OOo 2.o was being developed. But I don't understand what the difficulties are especially when you refer to vocabulary and facilities. I had also created dBase databases back in the OOo 1.x.x period when that was the only option. I had no problems moving to Base from the earlier dBase option. Facilities: Does this mean you want to know what abilities it has? What abilities would you like for it to have? Vocabulary: What are the terms you do not understand? What are the terms that you have used that you think might match the Base terms? I have read information about relational databases online as well as a couple of textbooks. I find the vocabulary used there is different from what Base uses, but it has never been so different that I could not recognize the new terms and apply them. I even find differences between the references I mentioned. I even found one source that is based upon the Algebra of sets! It does take some patience for a while to learn the difference in the terms used. And it pays to be flexible.

--Dan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to