On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:21:19 +0200, you wrote: >2012/6/4 drew <[email protected]> > >> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 11:00 +0200, Dwayne Henderson wrote: >> > I feel it's a major waste of resources that OOo has been split up into >> > multiple projects. >> >> Not at all the projects have different cultures, different development >> styles and different overall goals. >> > >Just because people come from different cultures doesn't mean they can't >get along. The main goal has always been to create the best Office suite >possible - so let's unite around that. > > >> > We should unite. >> >> >> It's that hard for a user - Pick which application suits you best and >> use it. >> > >No, what is hard for a user is having to choose between several projects >that all do the same thing. > > >> If you want to develop code for both projects you could do that, no one >> will stop you directly. >> > >That is the whole point of this thread - why waste time and brain power >making either project half-a**ed when we can unite and resume kicking MS >Office's a**? > >Mikkel Bravo someone has finally said what I have been thinking.
Have you not heard the term divide and rule 5 office products but only 1 Microsoft office (you know what you get right out of the box few sub flavours if it works for you then why look at anything else) I have enough time trying to get things done around here without having to try and sort out which product is best to use in my particular case. I use open office because of price. I wish for me that there was another reason but alas right now there isn't. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
