KG02 - My earlier question may be a non-starter due to licensing issues.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Kevin Grignon <[email protected]>wrote: > KG01 - See comments inline. > > On Jun 6, 2012, at 3:43 AM, Hagar Delest <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Le lun. 04 juin 2012 22:25:34 CEST, Mikkel Bang < > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > >>> There are also some real differences at play here - many of those > >>> differences are technical in nature, some are of a business model type > >>> and others are just colloquial in nature, but they are all valid > >>> differences of opinion between intelligent individuals. > > KG01 - Are their differences in the user model? What aspects of the user > experience in LibreOffice might we consider emulating, avoiding or > enhancing in AOO? > > >> > >> These are small differences. Differences that are easily set aside (all > is > >> fair in love and war) - if both parties want it enough - if both parties > >> care more about creating the world's finest office suite than they do > >> sowing disunity, flaunting their egos, or showcasing their hatred for a > >> third party (Oracle) that isn't even around any more. > > > > Small differences??? On the contrary, the license difference for example > is a key point. > > There are 2 projects with opposite business models: a copyleft > LibreOffice and a permissive license for Apache OpenOffice. > > > > BTW, have you asked the same question on the LibO ML? > > > > Hagar > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >
