Rick,
You know I did a little investigation, using a sort of reflexion and
discovered that. It is quite cool.
src = .array~new
src[1] = "::routine speak public"
src[2] = "use strict arg w = 'Hello World'"
src[3] = "say w"
src[4] = "return 0"
obj = .Package~new("test", src)
itr = .Package~methods
do while itr~available
say 'isPrivate:' itr~item~isPrivate
itr~next
end
rt = obj~publicRoutines
say 'rt:' rt
do i over rt
say i
end
rtObj = rt["SPEAK"]
say 'rtObj' rtObj
itr = rtObj~class~methods
do while itr~available
say 'Method:' itr~index
mthObj = itr~item
say 'isPrivate:' mthObj~isPrivate
itr~next
end
--rtObj~callWith(.array~of("hello"))
rtObj~call
do l over rtObj~source
say l
end
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Realized I didn't answer all of your questions. The other new class
> is the Routine class, which decouples Routines from Methods.
> Previously, a ::ROUTINE directive created a Method object....now it
> creates a Routine object. You could also have generated the parser
> errors using a Routine object in the same way. One nice thing about
> Routine instances is they are callable using either
>
> result = r~call(a,b,c)
>
> or
>
> result = r~callwith(.array~of(a,b,c))
>
> Rick
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Mark Miesfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I was looking at what you've done for processing syntax errors in the
>>> CONSTANT directive test group, and I have some suggestions that might
>>> make these types of tests easier to manage. To start with, you can
>>> completely eliminate the need to write this to a file by using the new
>>> package class. For example,
>>>
>>> src = .array~new
>>> src[1] = "return 0"
>>> src[2] = ""
>>> src[3] = "::class 'TestClass'"
>>> src[4] = "::constant PI 3.14195"
>>> src[5] = "::constant ZERO 0.0"
>>> src[6] = "::constant PI 3.14195"
>>
>> Will that looks good. Even though I saw the C++ PackageManager and
>> PackageClass while stepping through things in the debugger, I didn't
>> realize a new class had been added to what is available in Rexx code.
>>
>> Are there any others?
>>
>>
>>> p = .package~new("test", src)
>>
>> I like this a little better
>>
>> ::method test_x
>> <src creation>
>>
>> self~expectSyntax(99.932)
>> p = .package~new("test", src)
>>
>>> Also, it might be nice if this could be incorporated as part of the
>>> base infrastructure:
>>>
>>> self~assertSyntaxError(99.932, src)
>>
>> Then this, I think
>>
>> ::method test_x
>> <src creation>
>>
>> self~assertSyntaxError(99.932, src)
>>
>> because the second will raise the syntax error within the
>> ooRexxUnit.cls file. I think, have to look at that code again. If it
>> does, we would loose some of the info on where the real error was.
>>
>> --
>> Mark Miesfeld
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
>> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
>> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
>> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
