Yes, that's one of the reasons I want executing code to have access to
it's own package. Once you have that, you can do things such as
dyamically add other packages to your lookup scope, perform dynamic
class resolution, etc. At lot of these functions will be particularly
useful from the native APIs.
Rick
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Mark Miesfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rick,
>
> You know I did a little investigation, using a sort of reflexion and
> discovered that. It is quite cool.
>
> src = .array~new
> src[1] = "::routine speak public"
> src[2] = "use strict arg w = 'Hello World'"
> src[3] = "say w"
> src[4] = "return 0"
>
> obj = .Package~new("test", src)
>
> itr = .Package~methods
> do while itr~available
> say 'isPrivate:' itr~item~isPrivate
> itr~next
> end
>
> rt = obj~publicRoutines
>
> say 'rt:' rt
>
> do i over rt
> say i
> end
>
> rtObj = rt["SPEAK"]
> say 'rtObj' rtObj
>
> itr = rtObj~class~methods
> do while itr~available
> say 'Method:' itr~index
> mthObj = itr~item
> say 'isPrivate:' mthObj~isPrivate
> itr~next
> end
>
> --rtObj~callWith(.array~of("hello"))
> rtObj~call
> do l over rtObj~source
> say l
> end
>
> --
> Mark Miesfeld
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Realized I didn't answer all of your questions. The other new class
>> is the Routine class, which decouples Routines from Methods.
>> Previously, a ::ROUTINE directive created a Method object....now it
>> creates a Routine object. You could also have generated the parser
>> errors using a Routine object in the same way. One nice thing about
>> Routine instances is they are callable using either
>>
>> result = r~call(a,b,c)
>>
>> or
>>
>> result = r~callwith(.array~of(a,b,c))
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Mark Miesfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was looking at what you've done for processing syntax errors in the
>>>> CONSTANT directive test group, and I have some suggestions that might
>>>> make these types of tests easier to manage. To start with, you can
>>>> completely eliminate the need to write this to a file by using the new
>>>> package class. For example,
>>>>
>>>> src = .array~new
>>>> src[1] = "return 0"
>>>> src[2] = ""
>>>> src[3] = "::class 'TestClass'"
>>>> src[4] = "::constant PI 3.14195"
>>>> src[5] = "::constant ZERO 0.0"
>>>> src[6] = "::constant PI 3.14195"
>>>
>>> Will that looks good. Even though I saw the C++ PackageManager and
>>> PackageClass while stepping through things in the debugger, I didn't
>>> realize a new class had been added to what is available in Rexx code.
>>>
>>> Are there any others?
>>>
>>>
>>>> p = .package~new("test", src)
>>>
>>> I like this a little better
>>>
>>> ::method test_x
>>> <src creation>
>>>
>>> self~expectSyntax(99.932)
>>> p = .package~new("test", src)
>>>
>>>> Also, it might be nice if this could be incorporated as part of the
>>>> base infrastructure:
>>>>
>>>> self~assertSyntaxError(99.932, src)
>>>
>>> Then this, I think
>>>
>>> ::method test_x
>>> <src creation>
>>>
>>> self~assertSyntaxError(99.932, src)
>>>
>>> because the second will raise the syntax error within the
>>> ooRexxUnit.cls file. I think, have to look at that code again. If it
>>> does, we would loose some of the info on where the real error was.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Miesfeld
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
>>> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
>>> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
>>> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
>> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
>> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
>> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
