Mark, David, Now that you've had some experience using the new APIs, I have a question about whether we should add a couple of additional ones. In the APIs, there are two for quickly creating array instances, ArrayOfOne() and ArrayOfTwo(). These are created because there are situations where you need to pass an array item in to APIs. The specific cases I have in mind are SendMessage() and RaiseException(). However, those two APIs also have convenience versions that bypass the need to create an array (e.g., SendMessage1() or RaiseException2()). I'm wondering if I should raise the convenience level of these APIs by added ArrayOfThree() and ArrayOfFour(). One and Two items will cover a fairly high percentage of uses, though I suspect a lot of uses of these became unnecessary because of SendMessage1() et al. Three and Four will be particularly useful for a lot of method/raise invocations that require more than 2 arguments. Beyond four is, I think, the point of diminishing returns.
So, in your work with the APIs, have you found the need to create array items with more than 2 elements and had to fill them in the "old fashined way" Do you think adding these additional two would be useful? Rick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
