On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:48 AM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that you've had some experience using the new APIs, I have a > question about whether we should add a couple of additional ones. In > the APIs, there are two for quickly creating array instances, > ArrayOfOne() and ArrayOfTwo(). These are created because there are > situations where you need to pass an array item in to APIs. The > specific cases I have in mind are SendMessage() and RaiseException(). > However, those two APIs also have convenience versions that bypass the > need to create an array (e.g., SendMessage1() or RaiseException2()). > I'm wondering if I should raise the convenience level of these APIs by > added ArrayOfThree() and ArrayOfFour(). A while back I was going to ask you what you thought about adding ArrayOfThree() and ArrayOfFour(). I would use them for RaiseException(). And, I suspect when I get time to do more, I will be using SendMessage() more also. So, all in all I'm for it. But, it is not absolutely necessary. It is convenient once in awhile. -- Mark Miesfeld ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
