On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not too sure what do with this one. There are a number of APIs > that have basically no meaning at all in the 4.0 world, and this is > one of them. ... The line in the sand we've drawn so far has been to > support documented APIs, but if you've used undocumented ones, well, > tough. > > ... My gut feeling is > we should say "no" to this requested, but I'm willing to go with > whatever the consensus is.
In principle I agree with this, and think we should say no to this specific request based on that. It is the line I intend to take in ooDialog. Although, I did compromise on one specific instance (BinaryAnd) because it had been used through out the doc examples, even though it was not documented anywhere. I'm not 100% set against it in this case, because I'm not very familiar with those APIs. For instance, if it is a case that they used it because in was in a lot public examples, even though not documented. -- Mark Miesfeld ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
