Up until the point where you wish to pass an array as an argument or have a return value that is some sort of non-string type. Not everything maps well to just string data.
Rick On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:15 PM, David Ashley<david.ashley....@gmail.com> wrote: > I am completely ok with the limitation of only strings being passed to/from > a remote class. I agree that this would make whatever protocol we come up > with very simple and easy to implement. > > David Ashley > > On 07/21/2009 02:44 PM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote: > > Of course, the limitation was only string method arguments and results > could be marshalled back-and-forth. > > > Strings are good. :-) No proprietary formats ... > > Mike > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
