> I seriously wasn't expecting to see 128-bit processors in my lifetime > (or at least before my retirement).
Similarly, I was quite surprised when developing the IEEE decimal formats to find that -- almost without exception -- everyone in the industry has gone for the 128-bit format (34 digits). That length (quad) is also now in the standard for binary, too (and of course is already in IBM processors, for both binary and decimal). So -- at least for arithmetic -- 128-bit processors are here already. So maybe this is more about arithmetic sizes rather than address space. > Just for the giggle factor, 2*128 bytes would require a stack of punch > cards approximately 1.37x10**17 LIGHT YEARS tall! <chuckle> But it's the holes that matter .... Mike Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
