David, I prefer PDF's, because the HTML is quite limited in it's application. I can either view a PDF or print it (for use in the, um, library, in the morning) for more extended study. Still, those who use the HTML might find PDF's somewhat clumsy for online-only viewing. Why not install both and let the user decide?
-----Original Message----- From: David Ashley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 15:38 To: ooRexxDevel Subject: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Docs RPM I need opinions and I know this group has no shortage of those :-) I am going to create an RPM for the ooRexx documentation. What I need o know is what to put in the RPM - just PDFs, just HTML, or both? Since this is Linux I am leaning toward PDFs since almost all Linux distributions have pretty good PDF viewers and AcroReader is widely available as well. But I am open to other opinions. Let me know what you think. David Ashley ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
