Actually I came across a good reason not to include the HTML files. Normally I would just include the tar file for the HTML but that would not be of any use to anyone unless they were untarred. Unfortunately the user could not perform that activity since the subdirectory in which they reside is read-only. In addition, if I expanded them during the RPM install I would have to create additional subdirectories for each HTML document because they all use duplicate file names and would collide with each other. Producing additional subdirectories is not optimal because it makes the user have find the document they are looking for.
David Ashley On 10/19/2010 08:50 AM, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote: > As I use both, I kinda favor having both available to me on Linux. > > As a compromise, is it possible during install to ask the user? > > /s/ Bill Turner > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 > The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly > Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run > across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
