Bonjour Jean-Louis,

On 20.12.2011 22:51, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote:
> Guten abend Rony
>
>     Does this comment mean that your sandbox version of ooRexx is fully 
> Unicode-enabled already?
>
>
> no...I did not work on Unicode since several months. But since uft-8 is 
> compatible with ascii,
> it's possible to process utf-8 strings and pass them to (or receive them 
> from) oodialog. That's
> why I say I can use oodialog.wchar to test unicode, assuming I restart to 
> work on Unicode.
thank you for this clarification!

>
>     If so, how would you describe its stability? In any case: would it be 
> possible to get at a
>     binary version of it (Windows, Linux or Mac, any bitness) to be able to 
> test it over Christmas?
>
> The sandbox version is very stable. I run ooRexxShell daily, which loads 
> *all* the
> packages/libraries, including bsf4oorexx. After modifying one of the 
> packages, I enter the
> 'reload' command which reloads everything in a few seconds, and I test.
> I can deliver a binary version for Windows (32 bits)  and Mac (64 bits) 
> through dropbox. The main
> thing to test is the RexxContextualSource (that I will probably rename 
> RexxBlock) and all its
> derivatives.
Ah, once you have done that I would be interested in either binary! This will 
allow me to experiment
with your implementation of extensions, maybe your "ooRexxShell" and your 
implementation of
closures, which also look *very* interesting!

>
>     ---
>
>     Also another question in this context: what about oodialog.wchar that you 
> state to be
>     "outdated", was it fully Unicode-enabled (as wchar and your respective 
> documentation in the
>     sandbox indicate)? What about the newest version of oodialog then?
>
>
> yes, oodialog.wchar is fully Unicode. Internally, all the strings are utf-16 
> strings. At the
> boundaries, the multi-bytes strings (which covers ascii, utf-8 strings) are 
> converted to/from
> UTF-16. You have just to specify the code page of the multi-bytes strings.
> I don't plan to redo this work for the new oodialog, But the work is not 
> lost...
Again many thanks for this clarification (also for Mark Miesfeld's comment) !

Best regards,

---rony
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create 
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the 
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to