Forwarding for Walter

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Walter Pachl <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:17 PM
Subject: pls post for me
To: Rick McGuire <[email protected]>


Rick,

I don't know why this was rejected

You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has
been automatically rejected.  If you think that your messages are
being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
[email protected].

--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---
Datum:  [Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:12:42 +0200]
Von:  Walter Pachl <[email protected]>
An:  Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
<[email protected]>

Betreff:  Rosetta code: arrays

Here is a quote from there

http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Array_concatenation"REXX doesn't have
arrays as such, but it has something that looks, feels,
and tastes like arrays: stemmed variables."

A perfect example for the necessity of a separate ooRexx solution.

I think that Language Rexx could state that (nearly) everything shown here works
under ooRexx

And Language ooRexx could refer to Rexx, then summarize the extensions,
 and show ooRexx-specific solutions to the tasks where it applies.

An aside-- the feedback to my 'rosetta-survey' was extremely disappointing. 4 or
so responses.
So: is it worthwhile at all to pursue this 'project'???

:-(
Walter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to